Forensic patients have lost many fundamental human rights due to past legal offenses, though they still retain various rights associated with their healthcare. Often, unequal care disparities exist with forensic patients compared to their civilian counterparts due to preconceived biases toward these populations. Consequently, care for the forensic patient and their already limited autonomy are compromised. A primary manifestation of compromised care for forensic patients occurs when the correctional facility of a forensic patient cannot accommodate a specific therapy. A correctional facility’s limitations should not preclude patients from receiving their preferred medical option inpatient and upon discharge from the medical facility. A forensic patient’s choice for medications, examinations, or treatments should not be excluded as a viable therapy if their correctional facility is unable or unwilling to provide the necessary care and operational functions the therapy requires. We hold that discharging patients to their correctional facility should be held to the minimum standards of non-maleficence and autonomy. Synonymous with non-forensic populations, a forensic patient’s goals and values must be prioritized and not limited by the facility where the patient resides. Consequently, we argue that the role of medical providers is to advocate for those therapies and interventions that are both medically necessary and the desired wish of the patient, regardless of the patient’s correctional facility.